Lesson 2
Setting up an Ensemble group
In this lesson we'll explore how
to start an Ensemble Group
Contents
This lesson © Derek Hasted 1998 - please enjoy!
The People
Choosing your partners
Ideally, you are perhaps looking for people with the same ability
and commitment.
But in an ideal world, the word "ideally" wouldn't exist!
Having the same commitment is perhaps the more important,
because there is a good selection of Guitar Ensemble Music which
is of split ability, with parts at a variety of standards.
Commitment in an Ensemble is two-fold
- Commitment to work on a part at home so the time together
is used well
- Commitment to attend Ensemble practices regularly
I've stressed "regularly". That's not the same as "frequently",
and if anything, the meetings mustn't be too often. Coming together
with unprepared music is going to waste of lot of time and cause
a lot of frustration. Besides, it's bad enough finding time to practise
alone, when you can slip odd half hours into such spare moments
as you can. To dedicate a large block of time in advance for a play-through
can be quite intrusive on your free time (or worse, on that of the
person you live with!)
I reckon that a play-through once a fortnight is optimum. Hang
on. You don't know the word "fortnight" ? Sorry - It's
this common language thing again! Nothing to do with having battled
with a knight in shining armour. It's a British contraction of fourteen
nights; perhaps I ought to have said two weeks, and missed the knight
joke out, come to think of it....
There's no way that Ensemble playing should attempt to replace
ordinary Solo practice. For many people, Ensemble playing is a relaxation,
a treat, and the reward for doing all that other, solo, practice.
Ideally, you want to play with people who share your abilities
and your lifestyle, so that you can enjoy the social chit chat before
and after the playing, as well as feeling comfortable as you play.
I'm not going to tell you how to organise your life - I have trouble
enough organising mine - but you might find that the Ensemble gels
best if you are all in the same age band - twenties and thirties,
or fifties and sixties, for example. And don't think that advancing
years somehow disadvantages you as a player. An Ensemble generally
needs a little more patience and a little more attention to detail
than you might be used to in Solo playing. I think you'll find that
the wisdom of the years is a positive asset.
Does it work if the group has members of both sexes? I'd give a
resounding yes in almost every situation. Ensembles aren't about
egos, and a mixed sex group often seems to be able to develop faster
and resolve its problems more smoothly, if only because the group
tends to be able to list more points of view and discuss them better.
In all events, a good Ensemble will lift the weaker players, not
hold back the stronger ones.
An Ensemble practice is much like a real performance without an
audience.
If you started Guitar with the wish to be able to "play"
something, then an Ensemble is a real and concrete way of seeing
that wish come true.
And if, to finish this section, you have no choice about who is
or isn't in your Ensemble group, well, never mind! I've seen some
truly deep friendships kindled when adult beginners of mine have
started to meet, untutored, to play Ensembles. These are people
whose only connection with each other is that they enrolled for
the same College course.
Talking of which, it's a joke of mine that each adult College class
I teach begins with my observation that there's probably going to
be a romance, somewhere in that class before the course is over.
And I reckon that's proved to be the case more years than not!
When I die, I think I'm going to come back as Cupid... But read
my caution on adultery!
Back to top
How many partners should you have
at any one time? Does size matter?
What's the ideal size of an Ensemble? I've worked with 'ensembles'
from 3 to 37 players, though I've seldom used music in more than
6 parts.
So let me define straight away the use of the word Orchestra in
this article to denote several players on each line of music, and
the word Ensemble to denote a single player on each line. And then,
let me get them all muddled up again elsewhere in this page.
I regard a trio as the smallest group which defines a Guitar Ensemble.
"What about Duets?", I hear you ask. Well, actually, I
didn't hear you ask, but I suspect you're wondering, nonetheless.
There are a number of great differences between a duet and any other
size of ensemble....
- In a duet, you know who's played the wrong note....
- In a duet, your opinion can't be out-voted....
- In a duet, one person can dominate the pace, tone and
volume...
- In a duet, you don't get the large sound for minimal effort
that you get in an Ensemble...
- In a duet, isolated mistakes and buzzes don't tend to get lost
in a rich and full sound....
I hope you'll see that there are a lot of advantages, especially
with beginner and intermediate players, in playing Ensembles as
opposed to duets. Mind you, all of the points above are actually
beneficial if we're talking about pupil/teacher duets, where they
can aid learning and develop a keen ear in the pupil.
The main problem with an Ensemble of any size is one of
commitment.
- It is no good planning a practice a week in advance, only to
find that Bill's wife has invited her Mother to stay, and how
dare he go out for the evening.....
- And it's no good sitting with an empty music stand and an empty
chair, wondering why no-one can hear the tune....
There is a related point here, and it's both very simple and very
important. If you form a quartet, it's most unlikely that any music
you'll buy will make sense if one player fails to make the practice.
And if you form a trio, you can't just change it to a quartet without
re-equipping yourselves with music And the music will be the greatest
expense in getting an Ensemble off the ground.
I suppose you could argue that 12 is a good number for an Ensemble,
because you can play trios, quartets and sextets, but joking aside,
the size of a group dictates a lot about what happens to that group
in its formative first months.
Back to top
The Music
Choosing the right music
It's no good turning up to your first practice with no music!
So it means that you've got to try to purchase something in advance...
"Just pick a piece you like in the right number of parts.
That's all, isn't it?"
Oh dear, no!
Much Ensemble music doesn't look too difficult, and there is a
temptation to choose something taxing, which has the promise of
delivering something truly remarkable. In all probability it will.
It will deliver a truly remarkable pig's ear and no amount of fancy
fingerwork will turn it into anything other than a well-fingered
pig's ear.
That's the point at which everyone assumes everyone else is at
fault, and everyone decides that solo Guitar has a lot going for
it after all.
Why does this happen? It's quite simple. Firstly, everyone's playing
has shape and structure to each phrase. And everyone trying a piece
which is new to them will have hesitations and, shall we say, unusual
chords. Concentrating on ploughing through a new piece will invariably
tie up not only your fingers and eyes, but also your brain, which
is trying to control all your peripheral bits and is fairly busy
with it, thank you very much.
Put simply, when you are playing a new piece, your brain is flat
out. And it's too busy to listen. Far too busy.
Did you realise that you can play an entire piece of music and
be so busy with reading and fingering that you don't actually hear
it? Maybe not, but it happens, especially if the piece is near to
your limit of ability. But stick three or four players together
on a hard ensemble, and each will slow down where their part is
tricky, (which is invariably where someone else's part is ridiculously
easy!) and the whole lot comes apart at the seams because no-one
is listening. Indeed, with only your own music in front of you,
it's hard to work out what you might be trying to listen to anyway.
So let's take a different view. If you play in a quartet, you are
going to get four times the complexity out of the blended sound
than the effort you each put in. And so a simple part doesn't, in
general, mean you get a simple sound. With skilful writing, the
sound which comes out can be both full and intricate for very little
effort.
- Pick a piece which looks to be rather too easy for you.
- If I'm wrong, you'll sail through it and wish you'd something
more of a challenge.
- If I'm right, you'll have a piece which is just right for
you.
In either case, you'll spend the evening playing music together.
- If you choose a piece that's too hard, you'll spend the evening
holding post mortems and feeling very down.
And the easier music is often less expensive to buy too. How's
that for a compelling secondary argument?
Back to top
A starter pack of music
Many publishers can sell you a book of Ensembles (generally, the
thicker the book, the better the value!), and the more conscientious
publishers will grade the pieces in difficulty. Do look at my Links
page to follow the links to such a publisher - Corda - where you'll
find over 160 graded Guitar Editions, most containing a number of
pieces. How's that for choice?
There is no such thing as a definitive starter pack - what your
Ensemble plays is going to depend on your individual abilities,
(and whether they are the same as each other), on your collective
average ability, and on what mix of private (solo) practice to Ensemble
practice you intend to do.
What I suggest you do is let me furnish you with your very first
starter pack. How can I
address the number of players you have and the standard you are?
I can't. So of course it cannot be the definitive pack. But
click on the starter pack
link. You'll find a number of pieces in a number of parts. None
of it will be "just right". But you will find a
trio you might know, and which I know that I know. Hang on- I'm
getting dizzy - I must have a cold in the knows.
By taking a trio which I know works, and which I have tested out
on my pupils, and which I reckon you will enjoy, it will at least
enable you to get a subjective feel for how the complexity or simplicity
of each part maps onto the complexity or simplicity of the whole
piece. I've already said that it's important not to begin with a
piece in which everyone is struggling to play their own lines. So
please, come to my e-rehearsal,
and by the end of the session, you will have had a little instruction
on a trio which you can take away with you, and some pieces in 2
and 4 parts too.
Back to top | to
Starter pack | To E-rehearsal
It's your Round
I have one more suggestion for the "ultimate starter pack",
and it is to pick some rounds - Frère Jacques may be one
that you know, and I have a whole host of others. And I mention
them because they have several advantages over every other piece
you might want to try...
- No player has the "best" part - they're all the same.
- No player has the duff left-over part.
- Everyone has the tune.
- No-one has the difficult rhythm.
- Because each player in turn takes a few bars of tune and a few
bars of bass, the round will work even with one player misssing
Can there be a fairer and more equable way to get started? Quite
right!
But where does one buy rounds for Classical Guitar Ensemble? I
have no idea, but I can tell you that music for Recorders and for
other melodic instruments like violin and flute is perfect. Easy
to locate, cheap to buy, value for money.
Here in the UK a couple of years back, for example, I found that
virtually every Music shop which caters for school musicians stocked
copies of
"Flying A Round" - pub A &C Black - ISBN 0-7136-2255-5
£7.99 (about $13)
Aimed at singers, violinists and recorder players, everything
is within the first position (though some benefit from being transposed
up a fourth).
Music is likely to be quite an expense in starting a group, and
a few rounds are a very cost effective way to have enough low-risk
pieces in your bag for the very first get-together.
Back to top
Where does one buy Ensemble Music?
If you go into an average provincial music shop and ask for the
Guitar Music section, you'll be directed towards a small rack containing
such gems as "293 Tunes You've Never Hear Of" and "75
Tunes You Can Strum One Chord To". If you do find a shop willing
to hold a stock of what is, to be honest, expensive and slow-moving
Classical Guitar music, you can be pretty sure that they will all
be solos and duets.
If you do go up to the counter and whisper that you'd like something
a little more unusual for the weekend, you can be sure to be accorded
that look of disdain which would make a greater man than me simply
wither.
"There's no call for that sort of thing around here!"
And they're right - there is little demand for Guitar Ensemble
Music. Mail Order is often the only realistic option. Be sure that
the music will arrive in a plain brown wrapping, looking for all
the world like you did order something a little more unusual
for the weekend. But where do you get it from, and how do you know
what to order?
Here's where the Web can be a superb resource. Many shops specialise
in Mail Order and advertise on the Web. The more progressive publishers
are starting to put incipits - little snippets of their wares -
up so you can see what you are buying. If your monitor supports
16 bit colour, have a close look at the wallpaper on this page and
you'll see two bars of my composition "Russian Steppes"
for Guitar Trio. Hardly a subliminal advert, as the wallpaper doesn't
say what it is or where to get it from!
As a starting point, you could look at Corda
Music's Web pages - a whole variety of material from 2 to 8
guitars, and all graded in difficulty from novice to masochist.
If you're in the UK, or can pay in Pounds Sterling, there's order
details on their Web Pages. If you are overseas, the most effective
way is to order the items by credit card from the Spanish
Guitar Centre Nottingham, quoting the Corda title and reference
numbers.
Apart from being very parochial like this, it's pretty difficult
to steer you towards a "good" source of Ensemble music.
It so much depends on how good you are, where you live, how much
you can afford, and what styles you like. But then, it is your
Ensemble, not mine, so maybe I shouldn't choose for you!
Back to top
Types of score
Ensemble music exists in one of two forms - Full Score and individual
parts.
If we were playing in an orchestra, we'd each have parts and the
conductor would have the Full Score (and very good eyesight, having
seen the size of orchestral Full Score) : there'd be no choice.
We often do have a choice. Well, not really - the publisher makes
the choice for us. We often have Full Score. Or Parts. Or both.
-
Full Score, as its name suggests, is the full music, so a trio
comprises three staves braced together.
I prefer Full Score, as I like to be aware of what the other players
are doing. Or should be doing...
Others find that keeping their eyes scanning the page, one a couple
of inches above the other, tends to induce nausea.
There definitely is a knack to tracing one stave in the
midst of many, and there is a huge payoff if you can cast
an eye to the parts above and below yours to see what you expect
to be hearing - it's the best way of keeping tightly in step.
If you can't find your part in several staves at one, use a highlighting
pen to mark the
| |
Front of each |
| |
Line of music |
| |
Which belongs |
| = |
|
| |
To your part |
| |
So you don't get lost. |
| |
See? |
The downside is in the large number of page turns. Even with sympathetic
typesetting, it's unlikely that the page turn is going to coincide
with all the players having open strings and a free left
hand! Check with the copyright authorities in your country - it
may well be legal for you, the owner of the copy, to photocopy
parts of the score so that you can move the page turn to where
you want. But remember that purchasing a full score of
a trio does not accord you the right to take two copies for the
others in the trio - you'll need three copies - another downside
to Full Score.
- Parts, on the other hand, mean that page turns are really quite
rare, and those that are required can often be set at convenient
points in the score, because your page turns don't have
to be at the same time as the others in the Ensemble. You might
feel, initially, that you are playing independently of your partners,
as you have visual instruction and audible feedback on what you
are doing, but only audible confirmation of what they are
doing. However, a considerate typesetter will scatter bar numbers,
Rehearsal Marks and cue phrases all over your part so that at
least you know when you are lost...
I've placed a number of works with a
particular publisher who supplies the music in both forms, and
this really is the most sensible way. Phrasing, articulation and
dynamics can be planned, together, on the Full Score, and transcribed
to the parts which are taken away to practise. The Full Score serves
as a useful agenda during the post mortem after the first playing....
Back to top
Types of Music
Generalisations generally don't work.
But generally speaking, there are two types of Ensemble music for
Guitar.
- Polyphonic
Here, each Ensemble player has a "proper", multi-line,
Guitar part to play.
On the plus side, you can get a great sound this way, though badly
written Ensemble music in this style will sound woolly because
of the preponderance of bass notes which can result.
On the minus side, the music is inherently tricky, and often the
tricky spots do not coincide, meaning that the music has a tendency
to fall apart until it has been tightly rehearsed over and over.
Some players might end up with a lot of tricky chord work up the
neck if the composer has tried to avoid the woolly sound I've
just mentioned.
- Melodic
Here, each Ensemble has a single thread of music, like every line
in the orchestra. OK, like every line except the xylophone.
On the plus side, the music tends to "go" at its first
playing, and I cannot stress how important this is if your group
meets rarely. There's a second, hidden, plus too. There's the
chance to do vibrato, the chance to pull a single thread of music
out, the chance to mix tonal variations across the parts, the
chance to take intermediate parts right up the neck for a stunningly
rounded sound.
On the minus side, it is quite challenging for the arranger to
make this style work really well. Indeed, no-one since Bach has
really got the hang of it. A poor arrangement can not only
sound rather anaemic, but the inner parts, in particular, can
be indescribably naff to play as they rush around filling in all
the harmonic gaps left after the tune and bass have been written.
Horses for courses. I write in both styles, though my preference
is to accept the challenge and go for the clarity which the melodic
style can give.
My "Saraband"
once attracted the comment "It delivers a lot more than it
looks like it would", which is a remark which warmed my heart,
because a piece which is easy to play and sounds more impressive
than you expect is just the sort of thing which can lift an Ensemble
Group to new heights.
(For ordering details, visit my Shop)
Not been paying attention? Shame on you - Back
to Lesson 1!
Download this article
|